Related Posts with Thumbnails
The Book

Out now at Amazon | Waterstones

Middle Class Handbook on Twitter
Chattering Class

Leicester City overkill

Yes we get it, it's lovely. But can we talk about something else now?

Online petitions

Please sign our online petition to have them banned


The new Frozen

Artisan marshmallows


The word “artisan”


Discussing sourdough recipes

You buy it? Might as well wear a Burberry baseball cap

Getting the right shade of fake tan

“Just enough to stop my legs looking like something I dug up”

Travelling off-peak on rural branchline trains


Pointless gadgets made by start-ups

Usually no better than Innovations catalogue stuff

Latest Comments
The Periodic Table of the Middle Class
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « New Olympic sport #435: supermarket slalom | Main | Maslow's hierarchy of sparkling water »

    Whose fault is it anyway? 

    So, have you noticed that nobody’s accountable for anything anymore? When the media reports resignations of leaders, for example, they are said to be stepping down ‘over’ something. Or news might come of someone being sacked ‘amid concerns’ about something else. Clever. If someone loses their position ‘because of’ or ‘for’ something, it was definitely their fault; something they did was the specific reason for the stepping down or the sacking. Resigning or being sacked ‘over’ or ‘amid’ an issue leaves it ambiguous – perhaps lots of people were at fault but one person was forced to walk the plank as a political gesture. The impression is that there’s a general mess, out of which steps one person as an example to us all.

    Who’s driving this? I’m not sure, but it’s pervasive. It’s the same malady that causes politicians to say that ‘questions need to be asked’ and ‘lessons need to be learnt’, passive expressions that mean nobody’s actually responsible for the questions or the lessons. But, remember, kids, where there’s an object, there’s a subject.

    Reader Comments (8)

    Where there's an object there is a subject?

    Demonstrably wrong.

    "Don't talk nonsense!" Object - no subject.


    September 22, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterPedant

    ... and the MC angle of this entry is....?

    September 22, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterLevantinelass

    Actually, with imperative expressions such as "Don't talk nonsense", the subject is implied and contained by the verb. The subject is "you".

    September 24, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMiss York

    Yes, the subject is merely implied, which again emphasises that is not there.

    September 24, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterPedant

    I love the attention to language in this post - brilliant observation.

    September 24, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterLouise

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>